Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on The Virtual Advisor

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bulmer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Privacy and Confidentiality as Obstacles to Interweaving Formal and Informal Social Care: The Boundaries of the Private Realm

Martin Bulmer

London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Social Science and Administration, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, Great Britain

Community care provides a setting in which both public, formal social care and private, informal, social care have the potential to complement one another in meeting the needs of dependent persons. The theoretical implications of "interweav ing" formal and informal care are considered in the light of concerns about privacy and confidentiality which may limit such potential collaboration. The obstacles to those working in welfare agencies tapping informal networks are highlighted. Em pirical evidence from the study of neighbors and neighborhood care is presented to show that drawing boundaries around a private sphere belonging to the self and the family is universal and that various defences are erected against gossip and the local sharing of personal information. The implications of such privacy concerns for interweaving are considered in terms of balance theory, the substitutability of carers, the circumstances in which information may be shared with third parties, the use of natural leaders, and problems of professional responsibility. The need to rethink the boundaries of the private realm is suggested.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 1-2, 112-125 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/089976408701600109


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?