Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosentraub, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Political Culture, Nonprofit Organizations, and the Financing of Human Services

Mark S. Rosentraub

Students of fiscal policy have long noted the impact political culture has on spending levels. This relationship has not only been statistically dem onstrated but is incorporated in the stereotypical views held of certain areas. Some states are frequently identified as "low spenders," while others have a reputation for supporting services. When the federal government elected to reduce its support for many human services, an opportunity arose to understand whether political cultures had changed in some areas with regard to state and local support of human services. In states where the tradition was for low spendingfor services, did they respond by curtail ing programs, or did the public or private sectors increase their spending? In Texas, a state with a history of low spending levels for human services, neither the state legislature nor local governments increased their fiscal responsibilities for human services. However, there was a large increase in private sector contributions. The pattern of this response not only sheds new light on the political culture of Texas but also raises important challenges for financing nonprofit agencies and delivering human services.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 1, 95-111 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/089976409102000109


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
K. A. Gronbjerg
The U.S. Nonprofit Human Service Sector: A Creeping Revolution
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2001; 30(2): 276 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
W. Bielefeld and J. J. Corbin
The Institutionalization of Nonprofit Human Service Delivery: The Role of Political Culture
Administration Society, November 1, 1996; 28(3): 362 - 389.
[Abstract]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
M. Przybylski, L. Littlepage, and M. S. Rosentraub
Philanthropy, Nonprofits, and the Fiscal Health of Cities
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March 1, 1996; 25(1): 14 - 39.
[Abstract]