Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolff, N.
Right arrow Articles by Schlesinger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2, 203-236 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764098272006

Access, Hospital Ownership, and Competition between For-Profit and Nonprofit Institutions

Nancy Wolff

Rutgers University

Mark Schlesinger

Yale University

The authors argue that past studies of ownership inadequately control for the ways in which competition alters ownership-related differences. Survey data from 1975, 1980, and 1986 are used to estimate the changing effect of hospital ownership and between-sector competition on access to inpatient psychiatric care over a period when for-profit competition was increasing. Results show that during the noncompetitive period (1975), nonprofit psychiatric hospitals were more willing to admit costly patients. As cross-ownership competition increased, nonprofit hospitals became more willing to admit uninsured and underinsured patients, but they also grew more sensitive to cost of care. For-profit hospitals became more sensitive to the generosity of reimbursement but less sensitive to cost of care.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
A. D. Sinaiko and T. G. McGuire
Patient Inducement, Provider Priorities, and Resource Allocation in Public Mental Health Systems
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2006; 31(6): 1075 - 1106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
C. Chetkovich and P. Frumkin
Balancing Margin and Mission: Nonprofit Competition in Charitable Versus Fee-Based Programs
Administration Society, November 1, 2003; 35(5): 564 - 596.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
P. V. Rosenau and S. H. Linder
A Comparison of the Performance of For-Profit and Nonprofit U.S. Psychiatric Inpatient Care Providers Since 1980
Psychiatr Serv, February 1, 2003; 54(2): 183 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
W. Luksetich, M. E. Edwards, and T. M. Carroll
Organizational Form and Nursing Home Behavior
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2000; 29(2): 255 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]