Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Helburn, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Child Care Center Quality Differences: The Role of Profit Status, Client Preferences, and Trust

John R. Morris

Suzanne W. Helburn

University of Colorado at Denver

This study uses the Cost, Quality, and Child Outcomes in Child Care Centers data set to investigate the view that in a mixed industry providing complex services to poorly informed customers, for-profit producers provide lower quality than nonprofit producers by skimping on quality characteristics that buyers cannot easily observe. Results indicateno significant difference between for-profit and nonprofit centers in overall quality or in their tendency to skimp, except in North Carolina with its less stringent licensing requirements. When for-profit and nonprofit sectors are subdivided by ownership, however, for-profit chains and nonprofit centers operated by churches or community agencies produce significantly lower hard-to-observe quality than other nonprofit subsectors. In North Carolina, all for-profits, especially chains, produce lower hard-to-observe quality, suggesting that for-profit firms take advantage of low state licensing standards. These results indicate the importance of subdividing for-profit and nonprofit sectors to gain insight into industry performance, to design effective public policy, and to address the underlying problems of information asymmetry in the industry.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, 377-399 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764000293002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early Childhood ResearchHome page
J. Sumsion
The corporatization of Australian childcare: Towards an ethical audit and research agenda
Journal of Early Childhood Research, June 1, 2006; 4(2): 99 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
Y. H. Chun and H. G. Rainey
Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2005; 15(4): 529 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
M. CHAVES
Religious Organizations: Data Resources and Research Opportunities
American Behavioral Scientist, June 1, 2002; 45(10): 1523 - 1549.
[Abstract] [PDF]