Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Havens, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schervish, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Methods and Metrics of the Boston Area Diary Study

John J. Havens

Paul G. Schervish

Boston College

The authors discuss the conceptual framework, methods, and findings of the Boston Area Diary Study (BADS) to provide insights into the problems and prospects of survey research on philanthropy. First, the conceptual foundations and the operationalization of the variables are discussed. Next, the research design and methodology are described, and the findings are briefly summarized. Next, two validity measures are presented: a comparison of the BADS results with those subsequently obtained by The Gallup Organization from interviews with the same participants and a study of possible Hawthorne effects produced by repeated interviewing. Next, some specific recommendations are made for the operationalization and measurement of giving and volunteering and for improvements to field procedures. In the conclusion, the authors reflect on the implications of careful research methodology for an adequate assessment of the range and level of care in society.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3, 527-550 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764001303010
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qualitative InquiryHome page
T. Markham and N. Couldry
Tracking the Reflexivity of the (Dis)Engaged Citizen: Some Methodological Reflections
Qualitative Inquiry, July 1, 2007; 13(5): 675 - 695.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
D. J. Mesch, P. M. Rooney, K. S. Steinberg, and B. Denton
The Effects of Race, Gender, and Marital Status on Giving and Volunteering in Indiana
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2006; 35(4): 565 - 587.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
P. Rooney, K. Steinberg, and P. G. Schervish
Methodology Is Destiny: The Effect of Survey Prompts on Reported Levels of Giving and Volunteering
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2004; 33(4): 628 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
K. S. Steinberg, P. M. Rooney, and W. Chin
Measurement of Volunteering: A Methodological Study Using Indiana as a Test Case
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2002; 31(4): 484 - 501.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
P. M. Rooney, K. S. Steinberg, and P. G. Schervish
A Methodological Comparison of Giving Surveys: Indiana as a Test Case
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 2001; 30(3): 551 - 568.
[Abstract] [PDF]