Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCambridge, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 2, 346-354 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764004263551


Jounal Article

Underestimating the Power of Nonprofit Governance

Ruth McCambridge

Nonprofit Quarterly

Much of the dialogue around nonprofit boards has focused on secondary or transactional issues rather than on the question of what good governance must include in a nonprofit setting. This serves to rob the nonprofits of creativity, rigor, power, and the kind of finely tuned understanding of accountability the public should expect. By focusing on the central questions and principles of nonprofit governance rather than on structural concerns, the possibilities for a wider variation in governance models open up. All organizations are set in a larger social context, so we cannot end our reflection at the individual nonprofit level. These questions are particularly pertinent during a period when our attention is focused on governance from Wall Street to Baghdad. Some believe that public governance is overly affected by corporate interests, and we are now seeing case after case of scandals exposing ethical problems in the governance of corporations that only recently were seen as exemplary. This puts the interests of ordinary and particularly marginalized people at risk. In a democracy, the nonprofit sector is there to ensure that people have a voice in our future—at the community, national, and global levels. If we accept this as our primary role, it has implications for what should be present as constants in our governance structures.

Key Words: nonprofit governance • boards of directors • trustees • stewardship • account-ability • community-based organization • community building


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
M. M. Stone and F. Ostrower
Acting in the Public Interest? Another Look at Research on Nonprofit Governance
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 2007; 36(3): 416 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
J. B. Morrison and P. Salipante
Governance for Broadened Accountability: Blending Deliberate and Emergent Strategizing
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 36(2): 195 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
D. E. Garrett
The Debate Regarding the Better Business Bureau's Commitment to Neutrality: An Analysis of Local Better Business Bureau Boards of Directors
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March 1, 2007; 36(1): 22 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]