Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Delfin, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tang, S.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Philanthropic Strategies in Place-Based, Collaborative Land Conservation: The Packard Foundation's Conserving California Landscape Initiative

Francisco Delfin, Jr.

University of the Philippines, Diliman

Shui-Yan Tang

University of Southern California, Los Angeles

The Packard Foundation's Conserving California Landscape Initiative (CCLI), a US $175 million 5-year (1998-2003) program intended to conserve 250,000 acres of open space in three regions in California, exemplifies the potential contribution and pitfalls of a private foundation's engagement in contemporary place-based, collaborative conservation. The achievements and limitations of this philanthropic effort are revealed largely through interviews of program officers, grantees, and public officials. Focusing conservation in three regions of the state, employing deliberate grant leveraging, promoting conservation partnerships, approaching conservation on multiple fronts, and building nonprofit capacities, CCLI preserved more than 300,000 acres of land, generated around $700 million in matching funds, raised the profile of conservation in the state and local communities' agenda, and fostered collaboration among diverse publics. However positive, CCLI efforts inevitably raised broader governance issues— transparency and accountability, agenda setting and representation, donor power and grantees' autonomy—related to the enlarged role of private money in public conservation.

Key Words: Packard Foundation • philanthropy • conservation • environment

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 3, 405-429 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764006287211


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
F. G. Delfin Jr. and S.-Y. Tang
Foundation Impact on Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations: The Grantees' Perspective
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2008; 37(4): 603 - 625.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
J. Sandfort
Using Lessons From Public Affairs to Inform Strategic Philanthropy
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 2008; 37(3): 537 - 552.
[Abstract] [PDF]