|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Do Public Subsidies Leverage Private Philanthropy for the Arts? Empirical Evidence on Symphony Orchestras
Arthur C. Brooks
Georgia State University
The relationship between public subsidies and private philanthropy is at the heart of a common claim that state subsidies "leverage" private donations to the arts. This claim might seem counterintuitive to some who find it more likely that state funding would crowd out private donations. This article empirically tests this question, using panel data on five major American symphony orchestras. The principal result of the statistical analysis is that neither claim is correct for these orchestras: The two funding sources are independent. This finding has significant managerial implications with respect to revenue-raising strategies for arts organizations as well as nonprofit firms in general. These implications and several related policy issues are discussed.
References
- Abrams, B. A., & Schmitz, M. D. (1978). The "crowding-out" effect of governmental transfers on private charitable contributions: Cross-section evidence. National Tax Journal, 37, 563-568.
- Abrams, B. A., & Schmitz, M. D. (1984). The "crowding-out" effect of government transfers on private charitable contributions. Public Choice, 33, 29-41.
- American Arts Alliance. (1995). Myths and facts about national support of the arts and culture [on-line]. Available: http://www.tmn.com/0h/Artswire/www/aaa/myth.html.
- Amos, O. M. (1982). Empirical analysis of motives underlying individual contributions to charity. Atlantic Economic Journal, 10(4), 45-52.
- Brooks, A. C. (1997a). Economic strategies for orchestras. Evanston, IL: Symphony Orchestra Institute.
- Brooks, A. C. (1997b). Improving the orchestra’s revenue position: Practical tactics and general strategies. Symphony Orchestra Institute Research Studies Series1, 1-16.
- Brooks, A. C. (1997c). Toward a demand-side cure for cost disease in the performing arts. Journal of Economic Issues, 31(1), 197-207.
- Burke, E. (1800). Thoughts and details on scarcity. London: F. & C. Rivington.
- Clotfelter, C. T., & Salamon, L. M. (1986). The impact of the 1981 tax act on individual charitable giving. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The economics of nonprofit institutions (pp. 207-223). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Connolly, L. S. (1997). Does external funding of academic research crowd out institutional support?Journal of Public Economics, 64, 389-406.[CrossRef]
- Economic report of the president (1998). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Feldstein, M. (1975). The income and charitable contributions: Part I—aggregate and distributional effects. National Tax Journal, 28, 81-100.
- Grampp, W. D. (1989). Rent-seeking in arts policy. Public Choice, 60, 13-22.
- Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438.[CrossRef]
- Hughes, P. N., & Luksetich, W. (1997, December). The relationship among funding sources for art and history museums. Paper presented at the 26th annual conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA), Indianapolis, Indiana.
- Jones, P. R. (1983). Aid to charities. International Journal of Social Economics, 10, 3-11.
- Khanna, J., Posnett, J., & Sandler, T. (1995). Charity donations in U.K.: New evidence based on panel data. Journal of Public Economics, 56, 257-272.[CrossRef]
- Kingma, B. R. (1989). An accurate measure of the crowd-out effect, income effect, and price effect for charitable contributions. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1197-1207.[CrossRef]
- Kmenta, J. (1986). Elements of econometrics (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
- Lindsey, L., & Steinberg, R. (1990). Joint crowdout: An empirical study of the impact of federal grants on state government expenditures and charitable donations. (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 3226). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- National Endowment for the Arts (MEA). (1998). Basic facts about the NEA: Did you know.? (online). Available: http://www.arts.endow.gov/learn/Facts/DidYa2.html.
- Netzer, D. (1978). The subsidized muse: Public support for the arts in the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Netzer, D. (1992). Cultural policy in an era of budgetary stringency and fiscal decentralization: The U.S. experience. In R. Towse & A. Khakee (Eds.), Cultural economics ‘92 (pp. 237-245). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Nisbet, R. (1986). Conservatism. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
- Ostrower, F. (1995). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Paqué, K. H. (1982). Do public transfers "crowd out" private charitable giving? Some econometric evidence for the federal republic of Germany (Kiel Working Paper No. 152). Kiel, Germany: University of Kiel.
- Posnett, J., & Sandler, T. (1989). Demand for charity donations in private nonprofit markets: The case of the U.K.Journal of Public Economics, 40, 187-200.[CrossRef]
- Reece, W. S. (1979). Charitable contributions: New evidence on household behavior. American Economic Review, 69, 142-151.[Web of Science]
- Ribar, D. C., & Wilhelm, M. O. (1995). Charitable contributions to international relief and development. National Tax Journal, 48, 229-244.
- Schiff, J. (1985). Does government spending crowd out charitable contributions?National Tax Journal, 38, 535-546.
- Schuster, J.M.D. (1990). Correlates of state arts support: The geographic distribution of organizations, artists, and participation. In D. B. Pankratz & V. B. Morris (Eds.), The future of the arts: Public policy and arts research (pp. 81-103). New York: Praeger.
- Schwartz, R. A. (1970). Personal philanthropic contributions. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 1264-1291.[CrossRef]
- Steinberg, R. (1985). Empirical relations between government spending and charitable donations?Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 14, 54-64.
- Steinberg, R. (1993). Does government spending crowd out donations? Interpreting the evidence. In A. Ben-Ner & B. Gui (Eds.), The nonprofit sector in the mixed economy (pp. 99-125). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Throsby, C. D. (1994). The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 1-29.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1,
32-45 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764099281003
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
C. S. Horne, J. L. Johnson, and D. M. Van Slyke
Do Charitable Donors Know Enough--and Care Enough--About Government Subsidies to Affect Private Giving to Nonprofit Organizations?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
March 1, 2005;
34(1):
136 - 149.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. C. Brooks
Do Government Subsidies To Nonprofits Crowd Out Donations or Donors?
Public Finance Review,
March 1, 2003;
31(2):
166 - 179.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Toepler
Culture, Commerce, and Civil Society: Rethinking Support for the Arts
Administration Society,
November 1, 2001;
33(5):
508 - 522.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Froelich
Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
September 1, 1999;
28(3):
246 - 268.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
