Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herman, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Renz, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2, 107-126 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764099282001
© 1999 ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH ON NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND VOLUNTARY ACTION

Theses on Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness

Robert D. Herman

David O. Renz

University of Missouri—Kansas City

This article draws from the general literature on organizational effectiveness and the specialized literature on nonprofit organizational effectiveness to advance six theses about the effectiveness of public benefit charitable nonprofit organizations (NPOs). (a) Non-profit organizational effectiveness is always a matter of comparison. (b) Nonprofit organizational effectiveness is multidimensional and will never be reducible to a single measure. (c) Boards of directors make a difference in the effectiveness of NPOs, but how they do this is not clear. (d) More effective NPOs are more likely to use correct management practices. (e) Nonprofit organizational effectiveness is a social construction. (f) Program outcome indicators as measures of NPO effectiveness are limited and can be dangerous. The article concludes by considering three possible futures for NPO effectiveness research.

References

  • Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationships among board structure, process, and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 227-249.[Abstract]
  • Brudney, J. L., & Murray, V. (1998). Do intentional efforts to improve boards really work?Non-profit Management & Leadership, 8, 333-348.[CrossRef]
  • Cameron, K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32, 539-553.[ISI]
  • Crittenden, W. F., Crittenden, V. L., & Hunt, T. G. (1988). Planning and stakeholder satisfaction in religious organizations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 17, 60-73.
  • D’Aunno, T. (1992). The effectiveness of human service organizations: A comparison of models. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 341-361). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Eccles, R., & Nohria, N. (1992). Beyond the hype: Rediscovering the essence of management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Edwards, J. R. (1993). Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology, 46, 641-665.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577-1613.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Elmore, R. F. (1978). Organizational models of social program implementation. Public Policy, 26, 185-228.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fink, J. (1989). Community agency boards of directors: Viability and vestigiality, substance and symbol. In R. D. Herman (Ed.), Nonprofit boards of directors: Analyses and applications (pp. 89-117). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Forbes, D. P. (1998). Measuring the unmeasurable: Empirical studies of nonprofit organization effectiveness from 1977 to 1997. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 183-202.[Abstract]
  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). The social organization of an urban grants economy: A study of business philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Gray, S. (1998, April 9). New charity hopes to infuse non-profit world with business thinking. Chronicle of Philanthropy, p. 12-12.
  • Green, J. C., & Griesinger, D. W. (1996). Board performance and organizational effectiveness in nonprofit social service organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6, 381-402.
  • Herman, R. D. (1989). Concluding thoughts on closing the board gap. In R.D. Herman (Ed.), Non-profit boards of directors: Analyses and applications (pp. 193-199). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Herman, R. D., & Heimovics, R. (1990). An investigation of leadership skill differences in chief executives of nonprofit organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 20, 197-204.
  • Herman, R. D., & Heimovics, R. (1994). Executive leadership. In R. D. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (pp. 137-153). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997a, December). Board practices of especially effective and less effective local nonprofit organizations. Paper presented at the 1997 annual meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Indianapolis.
  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997b). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of non-profit organization effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 185-206.[Abstract]
  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1998). Nonprofit organizational effectiveness: Contrasts between especially effective and less effective organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 9, 23-38.
  • Holland, T. P., & Jackson, D. K. (1998). Strengthening board performance: Findings and lessons from demonstration projects. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, (9) 121-134.
  • Jackson, D. K., & Holland, T. P. (1998). Measuring the effectiveness of nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 159-182.[Abstract]
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992, January-February). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, pp. 71-79.
  • Knoke, D. (1994). Cui bono? Employee benefit packages. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 963-978.[Abstract]
  • Kushner, R. J., & Poole, P. P. (1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 7, 119-136.
  • Marsden, P. V. (1994). The hiring process. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 979-991.[Abstract]
  • Marsden, P. V., Cook, C. R., & Kalleberg, A. L. (1994). Organizational structures. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 911-929.[Abstract]
  • Marsden, P. V., Cook, C. R., & Knoke, D. (1994). Measuring organizational structures and environments. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 891-910.[Abstract]
  • Martin, L. L., & Kettner, P. M. (1996). Measuring the performance of human service programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Meyer, M. W., & Gupta, V. (1994). The performance paradox. In B. W. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 309-369). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Middleton, M. (1987). Nonprofit boards of directors: Beyond the governance function. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 141-152). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Murray, V., & Tassie, B. (1994). Evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations. In R. D. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (pp. 303-324). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Odom, R. Y., & Boxx, W. R. (1988). Environment, planning processes, and organizational performance of churches. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 197-205.
  • Ostrander, S. A., & Schervish, P. G. (1990). Giving and getting: Philanthropy as a social relation. In J. Van Til (Ed.), Critical issues in American philanthropy (pp. 67-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Paton, R., & Foot, J. (1997, December). Dashboards for non-profits—A new approach to an old problem? Paper presented at the 1997 meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Indianapolis.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition, and functions of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 349-363.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Boston: Pittman.
  • Plantz, M. C., Greenway, M. T., & Hendricks, M. (1997). Outcome measurement: Showing results in the nonprofit sector. In K. E. Newcomer (Ed.), New directions for evaluation, using performance measurement to improve public and nonprofit programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Provan, K. C. (1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 221-236.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Quinn, R. F., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 2, 122-140.[CrossRef]
  • Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). Operationalizing the competing values approach: Measuring performance in the employment service. Public Productivity Review, 2, 141-159.
  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Siciliano, J. I. (1997). The relationship between formal planning and performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 7, 387-403.
  • Smith, D. H., & Shen, C. (1996). Factors characterizing the most effective nonprofits managed by volunteers. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6, 271-289.
  • Stone, M. M., & Cutcher-Gershenfeld, S. (in press). Challenges of measuring performance in non-profit organizations. In V. A. Hodgkinson & P. Flynn (Eds.), Measuring the impact of the non-profit sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Tsui, A. S. (1994). Reputational effectiveness: Toward a mutual responsiveness framework. In B. W. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 257-307). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Tsui, A. S., Ashford, S. J., St. Clair, L., & Xin, K. R. (1995). Dealing with discrepant expectations: Response strategies and managerial effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1515-1543.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Zammuto, R. F. (1984). A comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 9, 606-616.[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
L. M. Benjamin
Account Space: How Accountability Requirements Shape Nonprofit Practice
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2008; 37(2): 201 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
J. I. Siciliano
A Comparison of CEO and Director Perceptions of Board Involvement in Strategy
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March 1, 2008; 37(1): 152 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
M. M. Stone and F. Ostrower
Acting in the Public Interest? Another Look at Research on Nonprofit Governance
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 2007; 36(3): 416 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
B. Gutierrez-Nieto and C. Serrano-Cinca
Factors Explaining the Rating of Microfinance Institutions
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 2007; 36(3): 439 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
R. E. McDonald
An Investigation of Innovation in Nonprofit Organizations: The Role of Organizational Mission
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 36(2): 256 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
C. Guo and W. A. Brown
Community Foundation Performance: Bridging Community Resources and Needs
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2006; 35(2): 267 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
D. Shilbury and K. A. Moore
A Study of Organizational Effectiveness for National Olympic Sporting Organizations
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March 1, 2006; 35(1): 5 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
J. E. Sowa, S. C. Selden, and J. R. Sandfort
No Longer Unmeasurable? A Multidimensional Integrated Model of Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2004; 33(4): 711 - 728.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Review of Public Personnel AdministrationHome page
E. Vigoda and A. Cohen
Work Congruence and Excellence in Human Resource Management: Empirical Evidence from the Israeli Nonprofit Sector
Review of Public Personnel Administration, September 1, 2003; 23(3): 192 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
L. D. Brown and A. Kalegaonkar
Support Organizations and the Evolution of the NGO Sector
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2002; 31(2): 231 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
D. Ashman
Strengthening North-South Partnerships for Sustainable Development
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, March 1, 2001; 30(1): 74 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
M. A. Merithew and L. Davis-Satterla
Protease Inhibitors: Changing the Way AIDS Case Management Does Business
Qual Health Res, September 1, 2000; 10(5): 632 - 645.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
R. D. Herman and D. O. Renz
Board Practices of Especially Effective and Less Effective Local Nonprofit Organizations
The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 2000; 30(2): 146 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herman, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Renz, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?