Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froelich, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pollak, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2, 232-254 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764000292002

Financial Measures in Nonprofit Organization Research: Comparing IRS 990 Return and Audited Financial Statement Data

Karen A. Froelich

Terry W. Knoepfle

North Dakota State University

Thomas H. Pollak

National Center for Charitable Statistics Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy

The IRS 990 Return is becoming an increasingly prominent source of financial data underlying descriptions of the nonprofit sector and studies of nonprofit organizations. However, questions about the quality of the data continue to be of concern. This study of 350 nonprofit organizations investigates the adequacy, reliability, and appropriate interpretation of IRS 990 Return data through comparisons of selected entries with corresponding measures from each organization’s audited financial statements. Both quantitative and qualitative methods are used to examine and explain the consistency between the two data sources. The study concludes that the IRS 990 Return can be considered an adequate and reliable source of financial information for many types of investigations, but preparers and users of the data need a clearer understanding of its purposes to enable appropriate interpretations.

References

  • Abramson, A. J. (1995). Sources of data on nonprofit finance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 5, 443-451.
  • Bowen, W. G., Nygren, T. I., Turner, S. E., & Duffy, E. A. (1994). The charitable nonprofits. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Chang, C. F., & Tuckman, H. P. (1990). Why do nonprofit managers accumulate surpluses, and how much do they accumulate?Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1, 117-135.
  • Cordes, J. J., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). Differential taxation of nonprofits and the commercialization of nonprofit revenues. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 195-214.[CrossRef]
  • Froelich, K. A., & Knoepfle, T. W. (1996). Internal Revenue Service 990 data: Fact or fiction?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 40-52.[Abstract]
  • Gorman, M., & Tanenbaum, J. (1993). New rules proposed for joint activities of NPOs. Journal of Accountancy, 176(4), 103-108.
  • Gronbjerg, K. A. (1989). Developing a universe of nonprofit organizations: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 63-80.[Abstract]
  • Gronbjerg, K. A. (1994). The NTEE: Human service and regional applications. Voluntas, 5, 301-328.[CrossRef]
  • Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1996). Nonprofit almanac: Dimensions of the independent sector (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hodgkinson, V. A., Weitzman, M. S., Noga, S. M., & Gorski, H. A. (1993). A portrait of the independent sector: The activities and finances of charitable organizations. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
  • Orend, R. J., O’Neill, M., & Mitchell, C. S. (1997). State nonprofit data bases: Lessons from the California experience. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7, 447-454.
  • Oster, M. (1998). Executive compensation in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 8, 207-221.
  • Skelly, D., & Steurele. E. (1992). The nonprofit sector and taxes: Invaluable and largely untapped research data bases. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2, 429-438.
  • Steinberg, R. (1987). Nonprofit organizations and the market. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 118-138). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1991). Amethodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 445-460.[Abstract]
  • Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1993). How well is debt managed by nonprofits?Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3, 347-361.
  • Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1998). How pervasive are abuses in fundraising among nonprofits?Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9, 211-221.[CrossRef]
  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Young, D. R., Bania, N., & Bailey, D. (1996). Structure and accountability: Astudy of national nonprofit associations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 347-365.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
C.-K. R. Hung
Immigrant Nonprofit Organizations in U.S. Metropolitan Areas
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2007; 36(4): 707 - 729.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
J. L. Callen, A. Klein, and D. Tinkelman
Board Composition, Committees, and Organizational Efficiency: The Case of Nonprofits
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2003; 32(4): 493 - 520.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
L. M. LAMPKIN and E. T. BORIS
Nonprofit Organization Data: What we Have and What we Need
American Behavioral Scientist, July 1, 2002; 45(11): 1675 - 1715.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
K. A. GRONBJERG
Evaluating Nonprofit Databases
American Behavioral Scientist, July 1, 2002; 45(11): 1741 - 1777.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
M. A. Hager
Financial Vulnerability among Arts Organizations: A Test of the Tuckman-Chang Measures
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2001; 30(2): 376 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froelich, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Pollak, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?