Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Netting, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Volunteer and Paid Ombudsmen Investigating Complaints in Six States: A Natural Triaging

F. Ellen Netting

Virginia Commonwealth University

Ruth Huber

Kevin Borders

University of Louisville

James R. Kautz, III

Marietta, Georgia

H. Wayne Nelson

Towson University

The Long Term Care Ombudsman Program provides an opportunity to explore how a public mandate is implemented through the use of paid and volunteer ombudsmen who investigate complaints in long-term care facilities. In this article, the authors report partial findings from a growing database across six states, focusing on what is known about the use of volunteers and paid staff complaint investigation. Findings reveal differences in the types of complaints received, the sources of complaints, and the percentage of complex (difficult) complaints investigated by volunteers and paid staff. These differences result in a natural triaging that occurs among volunteers and paid staff, so that complaints viewed as difficult to verify and resolve are automatically given to paid staff.

References

  • Aaronson, W., Zinn, J., & Rosko, M. (1994). Do for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes behave differently?The Gerontologist, 34, 775-786.[Abstract]
  • Administration on Aging. (1999). Long term care ombudsman annual report. Fiscal year 1996. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
  • American Association for Retired Persons/Legal Council for the Elderly. (1994). Survey of state ombudsman programs. Washington, DC: Author.
  • American Health Care Association. (1999). Facts and trends: The nursing facility sourcebook. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Arcus, S. G. (1993). The long term care ombudsman program: The primary ounce of prevention. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Barney, J. (1974). Community presence as a key to quality of life in nursing homes. American Journal of Public Health, 64, 264-268.
  • Bradley, E. H., & Walker, L. C. (1998). Education and advance planning in nursing homes: The impact of ownership type. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(3), 339-357.[Abstract]
  • Chelimsky, E. (1991, June 13). Access to and utilization of the ombudsman program under the Older Americans Act. United States General Accounting Office testimony before the Subcommittee on Aging, Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources.
  • Cherry, R. L. (1992). Agents of nursing home quality of care: Ombudsmen and staff ratios revisited. The Gerontologist, 31(3), 302-308.
  • Cherry, R. L. (1993). Community presence and nursing home quality of care: The ombudsman as a complementary role. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34, 336-345.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Connor, K. A., & Winkelpleck, J. (1990). Volunteer advocates: Differing role expectations of long-term care facility administrators and volunteers. Journal of Long-Term Care Administration,18(2), 12-15.
  • Dehart, K. (1999). The volunteer experience: Predictors of success in the long term care ombudsman role. Unpublished master’s thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis Oregon.
  • Fottler, M., Smith, H., & James, W. (1981). Profits and patient care quality in nursing homes: Are they compatible?The Gerontologist, 21, 532-538.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Glass, A. P. (1988). Improving quality of care in nursing homes. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 7, 406-419.
  • Greene, V., & Monahan, D. (1981). Structure and operational factors affecting quality of patient care in nursing homes. Public Policy, 29, 399-415.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Harris-Wehling, J., Feasley, J. C., & Estes, C. L. (1995). Real people, real problems: An evaluation of the long term care ombudsman programs of the Older Americans Act. Washington, DC: Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine.
  • Hooyman, N. R., & Kiyak, H. A. (1988). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Huber, R., Borders, K., Netting, F. E., & Kautz, J. R. (1997). To empower ombudsman with meaningful data: Lessons learned in building an alliance between researchers and long term care ombudsmen. Journal of Community Practice, 4(4), 81-101.[CrossRef]
  • Huber, R., Netting, F. E., & Kautz, J. R. (1996). Differences in types of complaints and how they were resolved by local long-term care ombudsmen operating in/not in area agencies on aging. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 15(1), 87-101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Huber, R., Netting, F. E., & Paton, R. N. (1993). In search of the impact of staff mix in long-term care ombudsman programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(1), 69-91.[Abstract]
  • Kahana, J. S. (1994). Reevaluating the nursing home ombudsman’s role with a view toward expanding the concept of dispute resolution. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2, 216-233.
  • Kautz, J. R. (1990, June 28). Capacities of the state long term care ombudsman programs. A report presented to the Special Committee on Aging, United States Senate, 101st Congress.
  • Klar, Y., Bar-Tal, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1988). Conflict as a cognitive schema: Toward a social cognitive analysis of conflict and conflict termination. In W. Stoebe, A. W. Kruglanski, D. Bar-Tal, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73-85). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Kusserow, R. P. (1991, June). Ombudsman output measures: Management advisory report. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General.
  • Litwin, H., & Monk, L. W. (1984). Volunteer ombudsman burnout in long term care services: Some causes and solutions. Administration of Social Work, 8, 99-110.
  • Lusky, R. A., Friedsam, H., & Ingman, S. R. (1994). Provider attitudes towards the nursing home ombudsman program. Denton: Center for Studies on Aging, University of North Texas.
  • MacInnes, G., & Hedt, A. H. (1999). Volunteers in long term care ombudsman programs: Training, certification, and insurance coverage. Washington, DC: The National Long Term Care Ombudsman Resource Center, National Citizens’ Coalition for Nursing Home Reform.
  • Monk, A., & Kaye, W. L. (1982). Assessing the efficacy of ombudsman services for the aged in long term care institutions. Evaluation and Program Planning, 5, 363-370.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Monk, A., Kaye, W. L., & Litwin, H. (1984). Resolving grievances in the nursing home: A study of the ombudsman program. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Nathanson, I. L., & Eggleton, E. (1993). Motivation versus program effect on length of service: A study of four cohorts of ombudservice volunteers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 19(3/4),95-114.[CrossRef]
  • National Association of State Units on Aging. (1993). Placement of state and local ombudsman programs and operation of local ombudsman programs. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Nelson, H. W. (1995). Long-term care volunteer roles on trial: Ombudsman effectiveness revisited. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 23(3/4), 25-46.
  • Nelson, H. W. (2000). Injustice and conflict in nursing homes: Toward advocacy and exchange. Journal of Aging Studies, 14(1), 39-61.
  • Nelson, H. W., Huber, R., & Walter, K. L. (1995). The relationship between volunteer long-term care ombudsmen and regulatory nursing home actions. The Gerontologist, 35(4), 509-514.[Abstract]
  • Nelson, H. W., Pratt, C. C., Carpenter, C. E., & Walter, K. L. (1995). Factors affecting vol unteer long-term care ombudsman organizational commitment and burnout. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(3), 213-233.
  • Nelson, H. W., & Walter, K. (1996). [Oregon State Office of the Long Term Care Ombudsman]. Unpublished raw data.
  • Netting, F. E., Huber, R., & Kautz, J. R. (1995). Volunteer and paid long term care ombudsmen: Differences in complaint resolution. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 13(4), 10-21.
  • Netting, F. E., Paton, R. N., & Huber, R. (1992). The long term care ombudsman program: What does the reporting system tell us?The Gerontologist, 32(6), 843-848.[Abstract]
  • Netting, F. E., Williams, F. G., Jones-McClintic, S., & Warrick, L. H. (1990). Volunteers in hospitalbased case management programs. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 7(4), 4-9.
  • Office of the Inspector General. (1991, June). Successful ombudsman programs (Rep. No. OEI-02-90-02120). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging and Office of Inspector General.
  • Office of the Inspector General. (1993, April). State implementation of the ombudsman requirements of the Older Americans Act (Rep. No. OEI-02-91-01516). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging and Office of Inspector General.
  • Portland Multnomah Commission on Aging. (1989). In search of ombudsmen, 1988-1989: A grant awarded by the Meyer, Memorial Trust to the Portland Multnomah Commission on Aging (research on marketing). Portland, Oregon: Author.
  • Riportella-Muller, R., & Slesinger, D. (1982). The relationship of ownership and size to qual ity of care in Wisconsin nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 22, 429-434.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rosko, M., Chilingerian, J., Zinn, J., & Aaronson, W. (1995). The effects of ownership, operat ing environment, and strategic choices on nursing home efficiency. Medical Care, 33, 1001-1020.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Schiman, C., & Lordeman, A. (1989a, December). A study of the involvement of state long term care ombudsman programs in board and care issues. Washington, DC: The National Center for State Long Term Care Ombudsman Resources, The National Association for State Units on Aging.
  • Schiman, C., & Lordeman, A. (1989b, December). A study of the use of volunteers by long term care ombudsman programs: The effectiveness of recruitment, supervision, and retention. Washington, DC: The National Center for State Long Term Care Ombudsman Resources, The National Association for State Units on Aging.
  • Skoog, I., Blennow, K., & Marcusson, J. (1996). Dementia. In J. E. Birren (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gerontology: Age, aging, and the aged (pp. 383-403). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Weisbrod, B., & Schlesinger, M. (1986). Public, private, nonprofit ownership and the response to asymmetric information: The case of nursing homes. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), The economics of nonprofit institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Zinn, J. (1993). The influence of nurse wage differentials on nursing home staffing and resident care decisions. The Gerontologist, 33, 721-729.[Abstract]

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, 419-438 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764000293004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Research on AgingHome page
P. D. Allen, W. C. Klein, and C. Gruman
Correlates of Complaints Made to the Connecticut Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program: The Role of Organizational and Structural Factors
Research on Aging, November 1, 2003; 25(6): 631 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Netting, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?