Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Easterling, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Using Outcome Evaluation to Guide Grantmaking: Theory, Reality, and Possibilities

Doug Easterling

University of North Carolina at Greensboro

References

  • Billitteri, T. J. (1998). Tracking the effectiveness of charities. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 10(16), 35-36.
  • Easterling, D., & Csuti, N. B. (1999). Using evaluation to improve grantmaking: What’s good for the goose is good for the grantor. Grantmaker’s Evaluation Network, 6(Summer), 2-3.
  • Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fine, A. H., Thayer, C. E., & Coghlan, A. (1998). Program evaluation practice in the nonprofit sector. Washington, DC: Innovation Network, Inc.
  • Letts, C. W., Ryan, W., & Grossman, A. (1997). Virtuous capital: What foundations can learn from venture capitalists. Harvard Business Review, 75(March/April), 36-44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • McNelis, R. H., & Bickel, W. E. (1996). Building formal knowledge bases: Understanding evaluation use in the foundation community. Evaluation Practice, 17(1), 19-41.[CrossRef]
  • Olds, D., Henderson, C. R., Cole, R., Eckenrode, J., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D., Pettit, L., Sidora, K., Morris, P., & Powers, J. (1998). Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children’s criminal and anti-social behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1238-1244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Patrizi, P., & McMullan, B. (1998). Realizing the potential of program evaluation. Foundation News and Commentary, 40(3), 30-35.
  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (1999). Philanthropy’s new agenda: Creating value. Harvard Business Review, 77(November/December), 121-130.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (1997). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Prager, D. J. (1999). Raising the value of philanthropy: A synthesis of informal interviews with foundation executives and observers of philanthropy. Washington, DC: Grantmakers in Health.
  • United Way of America. (1996). Measuring program outcomes: A practical approach. Alexandria, VA: Author.
  • Walker, G., & Grossman, J. B. (1999). Philanthropy and outcomes: Dilemmas in the quest for accountability (P/PV Briefs). Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
  • Weiss, C. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
  • W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (1998). W. K. Kellogg Foundation evaluation handbook. Battle Creek, MI: Author.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3, 482-486 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764000293009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cellbioedHome page
D. A. Felix, M. D. Hertle, J. G. Conley, L. B. Washington, and P. J. Bruns
Assessing Precollege Science Education Outreach Initiatives: A Funder's Perspective
CBE Life Sci Educ, September 1, 2004; 3(3): 189 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Easterling, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?