Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheever, K. A. L.
Right arrow Articles by deLeon, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fair Housing Advocacy Groups: Litigation as a Source of Nonprofit Funding

Kathryn A. L. Cheever

Peter deLeon

University of Colorado, Denver

Civil rights advocacy has long been a part of the U.S. tradition of nonprofit charity organizations. Even before the passage of federal, state, and local fair housing laws, groups of concerned citizens gathered together to improve opportunities for equal housing choice. Fair housing councils (FHCs) cropped up across the country as the Civil Rights movement expanded throughout the nation. As a part of then on profit "quiet revolution,"some FHCs have come across a new way to affirmatively further fair housing with much reduced government subsidies. This article explores the successes (and failures) of fair housing advocacy nonprofits that have sought compensatory and punitive damages through the courts for frustration of their missions and diversion of their resources. Some of these groups have moved from dependency on federal, state, and local government funds to reliance on court orders and civil settlements, whereby fair housing scofflaws pay for their transgressions by funding the work of these advocacy organizations.

References

  • Annison, M. (1996, October). Managing the whirlwind. Presentation at the Annual Colorado Association of Nonprofits conference, Denver.
  • Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 260-261 (1977).
  • Berry, J. M. (1977). Lobbying for the people. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Berry, J. M. (1978). On the origins of public interest groups. Polity, 3, 379-397.[CrossRef]
  • Booth, M. (1995, April 29). Park Hill fights plan waste-storage area too close. Denver Post (Final ed.), p. B.01-B.01.
  • Branch, T. (1988). Parting the waters. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
  • Chamberlin, C. (2000, June). President’s address at the National Fair Housing Alliance Conference, Washington, D.C.
  • City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc., No. 94-23 (U.S. Sup. Ct., May 15, 1995), aff’d, City of Edmonds v. Washington State Building Code Council, 18 F. 3d 802 (9th Cir. 1994).
  • Douglas, J. (1987). Political theories of nonprofit organization. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Fair Housing Act (Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619, 3631 (1982 & Supp. 1989).
  • Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroit. (2000, June 24). $160,000,000 and counting, a summary of housing discrimination lawsuits compiled for the National Fair Housing Alliance by the Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroit. Detroit, MI: Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroit.
  • Fair Housing Council of Suburban Philadelphia v. Main Line Times, 141 F. 3d 439; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6765; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 596.
  • Fair Housing Council of Suburban Philadelphia v. Mercury, No. 96-1382, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 773 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 1, 1999).
  • Fair Housing Council of Suburban Philadelphia v. Montgomery Newspapers. 205 F. 3d 1328; 1999 U.S. LEXIS 34819; 141 F. 3d 71; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6764; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4845; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27.
  • Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw, 528 U.S. 167 (2000), No. 98-822, 149 F. 3d 303, reversed and remanded.
  • General Accounting Office. (1995). Selected tax-exempt organizations (GAO/GGD-95-84BR). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Gladstone Realtors v. Village of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91 (1979).
  • Havens Realty Corp. v. Coleman, 455 U.S. 363 (1982).
  • Higginbotham, A. L., Jr. (1978). In the matter of color, race and the American legal process: The colonial period. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • HOME of Richmond v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Cir. court City of Richmond, No. 990733 (1998).
  • HOPE v. Malloy, 98-8855-CIV, FL (1998).
  • HOPE v. 330 74th St. Corp., 95-374-CIV, FL (1995).
  • HOPE v. Umbrella Fund, 94-6609-CIV, FL (1994).
  • HOPE /Chinye v. Milton, 93-1003-CIV, FL (1993).
  • HOPE/Givens v. Hamlet Estates, 90-1908-CIV, FL (1990).
  • HOPE/Myers v. Blue Lagoon Resort, 95-10043-CIV, FL (1995).
  • Housing and Community Development Act of 1987, 42 U.S.C. 3616 note; 24 C.F.R. part 125, § 561.
  • Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Com’n, 432 U.S. 333, 343 (1977).
  • Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 21 (1948).
  • Jenkins, J. C. (1977). The radical transformation of organizational goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 248-267.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Jenkins, J. C. (1987). Nonprofit organizations and policy advocacy. In W. Powell (Ed.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409, 413 (1968).
  • Kingdon, J. C. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Kyles v. Guardian Security Services, No. 98-3652. Retrieved July 5, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://laws.findlaw.com/7th/983652.html
  • Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992).
  • Mahoney, M. R. (1995). Segregation, Whiteness, and transformation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 143(5), 1659-1684.
  • McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1973). The trend of social movements. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
  • McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.[CrossRef]
  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Powell, W. (Ed.). (1987). The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Project Sentinel v. Evergreen Ridge Apartments, No. C-98-4369 VRW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 1999).
  • Ragin v. Harry Macklowe Real Estate, 6 F. 3d. 898 (2nd Cir. 1993).
  • Reeves v. Carrollsburg Condominium Unit Owners Association, No. 96-2495 (RMU), 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21762 (D.C. 1997).
  • Relman, J. P. (1998). It’s unfair and it’s illegal. Colorado Continuing Legal Education Seminar, Denver, CO. Retrieved December 4, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://www.home@newsed.com
  • Salamon, L., & Anheier, H. (1996). The emerging nonprofit sector. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  • Spann v. Colonial Village, Inc., 899 F. 2d 24 (CA D.C. 1990).
  • Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code, §§ 51-51.5.
  • Walker, J. L. (1983). The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. American Political Science Review, 77, 390-406.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Walker v. HUD, 3: 85-CV-1210-R (1985).
  • Williams v. Poretsky Management Inc., 955 F. Supp. 490 (D.C. 1996).
  • Yinger, J. (1995). Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York: Russell Sage.
  • Young, D. R., & Steinberg, R. (1995). Economics for nonprofit managers. New York: The Foundation Center.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, 298-320 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764001302007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
S. Ganapati and H. Frank
Good Intentions, Unintended Consequences: Impact of Adker Consent Decree on Miami-Dade County's Subsidized Housing
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2008; 44(1): 57 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheever, K. A. L.
Right arrow Articles by deLeon, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?