This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kaul, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Global Public Goods: What Role for Civil Society?

United Nations Development Programme

This article draws attention to the importance of public goods for the well-being of people, including, as a means toward this end, for the efficiency of markets. The author suggests that as a result of globalization, a growing number of public goods have assumed cross-border dimensions and become global public goods (GPGs). They can no longer be adequately provided through domestic policy action alone but require international cooperation for their adequate provision. The author argues that for globalization to work for all, it is important for civil society organizations (CSOs) to become more systematically involved in international negotiations and cooperation and to facilitate closer linkages between domestic policy making and international cooperation. Six policy options are discussed that could strengthen the role of CSOs in the provision of GPGs and in achieving more balanced and sustainable development.

References

• Birdsall, N., & de la Torre, A. (with R. Menezes). (2000). Washington contentious: Economic policies for social equity in Latin America [Online]. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Inter-American Dialogue. Available: http://www.thedialogue.org/publications/carnegie.pdf
• Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (Eds.). (1999). Constructing world culture: International nongovernmental organizations since 1875. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Burki, J., & Perry, G. E. (1998). Beyond the Washington consensus: Institutions matter. Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Edwards, M. (2000). NGO rights and responsibilities: A new deal for global governance. London: Foreign Policy Centre.
• Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perrathon, J. (1999). Global transformations, politics, economics and culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Ito, T. (1999, May). The role of IMF advice. Paper presented at the International Monetary Fund conference Key Issues in Reform of the International Monetary and Financial System, Washington, DC.
• Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (Eds.). (1999a). Defining global public goods. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 2-19). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (Eds.). (1999b). Global public goods: Concepts, policies and strategies. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 450-507). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Kaul, I., Grunberg, I., & Stern, M. A. (Eds.). (1999c). Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Khor, M. (2000). Globalization and the South: Some critical issues. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
• Mawdsley, E., Porter, G., & Townsend, J. (2000). How can Southern NGOs have more influence on the development agenda? [Online] New York: Global Policy Forum. Available: http://www.globalpolicy.org/ngos/role/globdem/globgov/2000/1219.htm
• Ocampo, J. A. (2001, January). Rethinking the development agenda. Paper presented at the American Economic Association Annual Meeting Panel Toward a Post-Washington Consensus on Development and Security, New Orleans, LA.
• Reinicke, W. H., & Deng, F. (with J. M. Witte, T. Benner, B. Whitaker, & J. Gershman). (2000). Critical choices: The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.
• Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far?Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
• Sandler, T. (1997). Global challenges. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Scholte, J. A. (2000). Global civil society. In N. Woods (Ed.), The political economy of globalization (pp. 173-201). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
• Sen, A. (1999). Global justice: Beyond international equity. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp.). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Stiglitz, J. (1998). More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the post-Washington consensus. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University/World Institute for Development Economics Research.
• Union of International Associations. (1996-1997). International organizations by type [Online]. Brussels, Belgium: Author. Available: http://www.uia.org/uiastats/stybv196.htm
• United Nations Development Programme. (2000). Human development report. New York: Oxford University Press.
• United Nations Global Compact Network. (1999). The global compact [Online]. New York: Author. Available: http://www.unglobalcompact.org
• Weiss, T. G., & Gordenker, L. (Eds.). (1996). NGOs, the UN, and global governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
• Willets, P. (Ed.). (1996). "Conscience of the world": The influence of nongovernmental organisations in the UN system. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
• Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? (pp. 5-38). Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
• Williamson, J. (2000). What should the World Bank think about the Washington consensus?The World Bank Research Observer, 15(4), 251-264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Zacher, M. W. (1999). Global epidemiological surveillance: International cooperation to monitor infectious diseases. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 266-283). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Zacher, M. W., & Sutton, B. (1996). Governing global networks: International regimes for transportation and communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 3, 588-602 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764001303013


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Shoham, A. Ruvio, E. Vigoda-Gadot, and N. Schwabsky Market Orientations in the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector: A Meta-Analysis of Their Relationships With Organizational Performance Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 2006; 35(3): 453 - 476. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kaul, I. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?