|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Congregations and Social Services: What They Do, How They Do It, and with Whom
Mark Chaves
William Tsitsos
University of Arizona
The charitable choice policy initiative has renewed attention to religion’s role in the U.S. social welfare system. The authors use data from the 1998 National Congregations Study to provide a portrait of congregations’ social service activities, emphasizing features of this portrait that are relevant to ongoing policy debates. In particular, they assess two claims often made about religiously based social services: Religious organizations represent an alternative to secular or government organizations by providing "holistic" and personalistic services focused on long-term solutions to individuals’ problems, and collaborations with secular, especially government, organizations threaten to undermine that approach to social services. Results support neither of these claims. Congregation-based social services are not an alternative to the world of secular nonprofit or government-supported social services; they are part of that world.
References
- Ammerman, N. (2000, November). Congregations and their partners in social service delivery: Methods and findings from the organizing religious work project. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, New Orleans, LA.
- Ammerman, N. (in press). Connecting mainline Protestant churches with public life. In R. Wuthnow & J. H. Evans (Eds.), Quietly influential: The public role of mainline Protestantism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Anderson, S., Orr, J., & Silverman, C. (2000). Can we make welfare reform work? The California Religious Community Capacity Study. Sacramento: California Council of Churches.
- Bartkowski, J. P., & Regis, H. A. (1999). Religious organizations, anti-poverty relief, and charitable choice: A feasibility study of faith-based welfare reform in Mississippi. Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment.
- Biddle, J. E. (1992). Religious organizations. In C. T. Clotfelter (Ed.), Who benefits from the nonprofit sector? (pp. 92-133). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Bush, G. W. (2001a, January 31). Agency responsibilities with respect to faith-based and community initiatives, Executive Order #13198. Federal Register, 66, 8495-8498.
- Bush, G. W. (2001b, January 31). Establishment of White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, Executive Order #13199. Federal Register, 66, 8499-8500.
- Carlson-Thies, S. (1999). Faith-based institutions cooperatingwith public welfare: The promise of the charitable choice provision. In D. Davis & B. Hankins (Eds.), Welfare reform & faith-based organizations (pp. 29-60). Waco, TX: J. M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies.
- Chambre, S. M. (2001). The changing nature of "faith" in faith-based organizations: Secularization and ecumenicism in four AIDS organizations in New York City. Social Service Review, 75, 435-455.[CrossRef]
- Chaves, M., Giesel, H., & Tsitsos, W. (in press). Religious variations in public presence: Evidence from the National Congregations Study. In R. Wuthnow & J. H. Evans (Eds.), Quietly influential: The public role of mainline Protestantism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Chaves, M., Konieczny, M. E., Beyerlein, K., & Barman, E. (1999). The National Congregations Study: Background, methods, and selected results. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 458-476.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Cnaan, R. A. (1997). Social and community involvement of religious congregations housed in historic religious properties: Findings from a six-city study. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania School of Social Work.
- Cnaan, R. A. (2000). Keeping faith in the city: How 401 urban religious congregations serve their neediest neighbors. Philadelphia: Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society.
- Department of Health and Human Services. (2001a, March 20). Fiscal year (FY) 2001 funding opportunities. Federal Register, 66, 15733-15735.
- Department of Health and Human Services. (2001b, May 24). Changes to a fiscal year (FY) 2001 funding opportunities notice. Federal Register, 66, 28757-28758.
- Dudley, C. S., & Roozen, D. A. (2001). Faith communities today: Areport on religion in the United States today. Hartford, CT: Hartford Seminary.
- Grettenberger, S. (2000). Churches as a community resource and source of funding for human services. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
- Grønbjerg, K. A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Harris, M. (1995). Quiet care: Welfare work and religious congregations. Journal of Social Policy, 24, 53-71.
- Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1993). From belief to commitment: The community service activities and finances of religious congregations in the United States. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
- Lincoln, C. E., & Mamiya, L. H. (1990). The Black church in the African American experience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- McCarthy, J., & Castelli, J. (1998). Religion-sponsored social service providers: The not-so-independent sector. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
- Miller, P. (1998). Hunger, welfare reform, and non-profits: Food banks and churches. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, University of Montana.
- Olasky, M. (1992). The tragedy of American compassion. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.
- Printz, T. J. (1998). Faith-based service providers in the nation’s capital: Can they do more? In E. T. Boris (Ed.), Charting civil society, No. 2 (Urban Institute report). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy.
- Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Salamon, L. M., & Teitelbaum, F. (1984, September/October). Religious congregations as social service agencies: How extensive are they?Foundation News, pp. 62-65.
- Sherman, A. L. (1995, Fall). Cross purposes: Will conservative welfare reform corrupt religious charities?Policy Review, pp. 58-63.
- Sherman, A. L. (2000). The growing impact of charitable choice: Acatalogue of new collaborations between government and faith-based organizations in nine states. Washington, DC: Center for Public Justice.
- Silverman, C. (2000). Faith-based communities and welfare reform: California Religious Community Capacity Study: Quantitative findings and conclusions. In S. D. Anderson, J. Orr, & C. Silverman (Project Team), Can we make welfare reform work? California Religious Community Capacity Study (pp. 66-95). Sacramento: California Council of Churches.
- Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Smith, S. R., & Sosin, M. (in press). The varieties of faith-related agencies. Public Administration Review.
- Stone, M. M. (2000, November). Scope and scale: An assessment of human service delivery by congregations in Minnesota. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, New Orleans, LA.
- Treadwell, D. O. (2000, November 4). Faith-based social services don’t need Feds’ money—Or meddling. Arizona Daily Star, p. E6-E6.
- Unruh, H. R. (1999, November). Saving souls, saving society: The role of evangelism in church-based social ministries. Paper presented at the annual meetingof the Religious Research Association, Boston.
- White House. (2001). Rallying the armies of compassion [Online]. Retrieved February 24, 2001 from: www.whitehouse.gov/news/reports
- Wineburg, R. J. (1992). Local human services provision by religious congregations: A community analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 107-117.[Abstract]
- Wineburg, R. J. (2001). A limited partnership: The politics of religion, welfare, and social service. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 23, 230-257.[Abstract]
- Workforce Development Branch. (2000). Faith-based initiative solicitation for proposal. Sacramento: State of California, Program Development and Management Division, Employment Development Department.
- Wuthnow, R. (1999). Mobilizing civic engagement. In T. Skocpol & M. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
- Wuthnow, R. (2000). Linkages between churches and faith-based nonprofits. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4,
660-683 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764001304003
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
A. A. Amirkhanyan, Hyun Joon Kim, and K. T. Lambright
Faith-Based Assumptions About Performance: Does Church Affiliation Matter for Service Quality and Access?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
June 1, 2009;
38(3):
490 - 521.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Reingold and H. K. Liu
Do Poverty Attitudes of Social Service Agency Directors Influence Organizational Behavior?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
April 1, 2009;
38(2):
307 - 332.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Wagner
Religion and Civil Society: A Critical Reappraisal of America's Civic Engagement Debate
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
December 1, 2008;
37(4):
626 - 645.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. B. Stritt
Estimating the Value of the Social Services Provided by Faith-Based Organizations in the United States
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
December 1, 2008;
37(4):
730 - 742.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Winkler
When God and Poverty Collide: Exploring the Myths of Faith-sponsored Community Development
Urban Stud,
September 1, 2008;
45(10):
2099 - 2116.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Nawyn
Faith, Ethnicity, and Culture in Refugee Resettlement
American Behavioral Scientist,
July 1, 2006;
49(11):
1509 - 1527.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. T. Kinney
Toppling Jefferson's Wall or Tiptoeing Around it?: Evaluating the Implementation of Faith-Friendly Welfare Policy
Administration Society,
March 1, 2006;
38(1):
3 - 30.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Sager and L. S. Stephens
Serving Up Sermons: Clients' Reactions to Religious Elements at Congregation-Run Feeding Establishments
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
September 1, 2005;
34(3):
297 - 315.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Owens and R. D. Smith
Congregations in Low-Income Neighborhoods and the Implications for Social Welfare Policy Research
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
September 1, 2005;
34(3):
316 - 339.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Kearns, C. Park, and L. Yankoski
Comparing Faith-Based and Secular Community Service Corporations in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
June 1, 2005;
34(2):
206 - 231.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Harris, R. Hutchison, and B. Cairns
Community-Wide Planning for Faith-Based Service Provision: Practical, Policy, and Conceptual Challenges
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
March 1, 2005;
34(1):
88 - 109.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Trinitapoli
Congregation-Based Services for the Elders: An Examination of Patterns and Correlates
Research on Aging,
March 1, 2005;
27(2):
241 - 264.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Reese
A Matter of Faith: Urban Congregations and Economic Development
Economic Development Quarterly,
February 1, 2004;
18(1):
50 - 66.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. CHAVES
Religious Organizations: Data Resources and Research Opportunities
American Behavioral Scientist,
June 1, 2002;
45(10):
1523 - 1549.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
