|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Place of Self and Reflexivity in Third Sector Scholarship: An Exploration
Margaret Harris
Aston Business School, England
This article draws attention to two significant strands in the development of contemporary social science scholarship: the recognition of the importance of self in research processes and the recognition of the reflexive nature of knowledge construction. It argues that these two strands should be taken more seriously by nonprofit and voluntary sector scholars. A family history case study is presented: the outcome of the author’s own research into the ways in which the lives of her parents and grandparents, as well as her own life, have been affected by nonprofit and voluntary organizations. The author considers how this has affected her own academic work in the nonprofit and voluntary sector field. The article concludes with a discussion of what, in the light of the case study, social science thinking on reflexivity and on the place of self in research might contribute to third sector scholarship in the future.
References
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
- Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice & mind. New York: Basic Books.
- Billis, D., & Harris, M. (1992). Taking the strain of change: UK local voluntary agencies enter the post-Thatcher period. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 211-225.[Abstract]
- Billis, D., & Harris, M. (1996). Introduction: Enduringchallenges of research and practice. In D. Billis & M. Harris (Eds.), Voluntary agencies: Challenges of organisation and management (pp. 1-12). London: Macmillan.
- Black, G. (1994). Living up west: Jewish life in London’s West End. London: London Museum of Jewish Life.
- Church, K. (1995). Forbidden narratives: Critical autobiography as social science. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
- Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Deacon, A., & Mann, K. (1999). Agency, modernity and social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 28(3), 413-436.[CrossRef]
- Denzin, K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Glennerster, H. (1995). British social policy since 1945. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Hall, P. D. (1992). Inventing the nonprofit sector and other essays on philanthropy, voluntarism and nonprofit organizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Hall, P. D. (1994). Historical perspectives on nonprofit organizations. In R. D. Herman (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (pp. 3-43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Hall, P. D. (1999). Blurred boundaries, hybrids, and changelings: The fortunes of nonprofit organizations in the late twentieth century. In G. Marcus (Ed.), Critical anthropology now: Unexpected contexts, new constituencies, changing genres (pp. 147-202). Santa Fe, NM: American College of Research.
- Hammersley, M. (1999). What’s wrongwith ethnography? The myth of theoretical description. In A. Bryman & R. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Harris, M. (1998a). Instruments of government? Voluntary sector boards in a changing public policy environment. Policy and Politics, 26(2), 177-188.
- Harris, M. (1998b). Organizing God’s work: Challenges for churches and synagogues. London: Macmillan.
- Harris, M. (2000). This charity business: Who cares?Birmingham, UK: Aston Business School.
- Harris, M., & Rochester, C. (2000, July). The governance of religious-based third sector organisations: An exploration. Paper presented to the Conference of the International Society of Third Sector Researchers Dublin, Ireland.
- Harris, M., & Rochester, C. (Eds.). (2001). Voluntary organisations and social policy in Britain: Perspectives on change and choice. London: Palgrave.
- Harris, M., & Torry, M. (2000). Managing religious organisations: A guide to the literature. Birmingham, UK: Aston Business School.
- Hertz, R. (1997). Introduction: Reflexivity and voice. In R. Hertz (Ed.), Reflexivity and voice (pp. vii-xviii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Holland, R. (1999). Reflexivity. Human Relations, 52(4), 463-484.[Abstract]
- Lipman, V. (1959). A century of social service 1859-1959. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
- Macduff, N., & Netting, E. (2000). Lessons learned from a practitioner-academician collaboration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 46-60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mason, D. (1984). Voluntary nonprofit enterprise management. New York: Plenum.
- Mason, D. (1996). Leading and managing the expressive dimension. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Milofsky, C. (2000). Transparent research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 61-80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Oakley, A. (1979). Becoming a mother. Oxford, UK: Robertson.
- Reinharz, S. (1979). On becoming a social scientist: From survey research and participant observation to experiential analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Rhodes, P. (1994). Race-of-interviewer effects: A brief comment. Sociology, 28(2), 547-558.[Abstract]
- Roer, K. (1981). Be my guest 40s style. Unpublished short story (in author’s possession).
- Rosaldo, R. (1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
- Smith, D. H. (1999). Researching volunteer associations and other nonprofits: An emergent interdisciplinary field and possible new discipline. American Sociologist, 30(4), 5-35.
- Stanley, L. (1993). On auto/biography in sociology. Sociology, 27, 41-52.
- Therborn, G. (2000). At the birth of second century sociology: Times of reflexivity, spaces of identity and nodes of knowledge. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 37-58.
- Titmuss, R. (1974). Social policy. London: Allen and Unwin.
- Van Til, J. (1988). Mapping the third sector. New York: Foundation Center.
- Warner, R. S. (1988). New wine in old wineskins: Evangelicals and liberals in a small town church. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Wineburg, R. (1999). The reverend and me: Welfare reform and the faith community’s role in social services. In D. Fauri, E. Netting, & S. Wernet (Eds.), Case book on macro social work practice (pp. 172-182). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Wolfe, A. (1998). What is altruism? In W. Powell & E. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4,
747-760 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764001304007
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
N. Srinivas
Against NGOs?: A Critical Perspective on Nongovernmental Action
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
August 1, 2009;
38(4):
614 - 626.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
