|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Fund-Raising and the Articulation of Common Goods
William W. Clohesy
University of Northern Iowa
Nonprofit organizations enable citizens to engage in diverse sorts of public action for the sake of common goods. Nonprofits‘ importance is recognized in political theory but less so in applied ethics. This article examines fund-raising from the perspective of applied ethics through examining Albert Anderson’sEthics for Fundraisers. The article’s concern is not fund-raisers’ day-to-day routine but the relationships they establish. Fund-raisers, it is proposed, emphasize developing relations with donors but not between donors and recipients, thereby creating the danger of donor dominance. Fund-raising, moreover, falls victim to business imagery likening donors with customers or stockholders and uncritically comparing fund-raising with marketing. Through analyzing these analogies, the article concludes that fund-raisers should seek to engage donors with the work, needs, and beneficiaries of their organization and articulate how nonprofits enable donors and beneficiaries to participate together in articulating and implementing public action for the common good.
Key Words: fund-raising • civil society • donor dominance • common good • civil society
References
- Anderson, A. (1996). Ethics for fundraisers. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
- Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
- Ball, T. (2001). Imagining marketopia. Dissent, 48(3), 74-80.[Web of Science]
- Barber, B.R. (1999). Clansmen, consumers, and citizens: Three takes on civil society. In R.K. Fullinwider (Ed.), Civil society, democracy, and civic renewal (pp. 9-29). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Belladuri, R. (1998). 8 steps to fundraising success. Nonprofit World, 16(4), 17-19.
- Bellah, R.B., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W.M., Tipton, S.M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Bellah, R.B., & Sullivan, W.M. (1981, September/October). Democratic culture or authoritarian capitalism?Society, 18, 41-50.[CrossRef]
- Berger, P., & Neuhaus, R.J. (1977). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
- Boris, E.T., & Odendahl, T.J. (1990). Ethical issues in fund raising and philanthropy. In J. Van Til and Associates, Critical issues in American philanthropy: Strengthening theory and practice (pp. 188-203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Buchanan, J., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Camenisch, P.F. (1981). Business ethics: On getting to the heart of the matter. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1(3), 59-69.
- Clohesy, W.W. (2000a). Altruism and the endurance of the good. Voluntas, 11(3), 237-253.[CrossRef]
- Clohesy, W.W. (2000b). Untimely thoughts on the public market. Paideia Project: On Line. Contributed papers to the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Boston, August 1998. Internet. 11 pp. June 15, 2000.
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic analysis of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
- Elshtain, J.B. (1995). Democracy on trial. New York: Basic Books.
- Evan, W.M., & Freeman, R.E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T.L. Beauchamp & N.E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (3rd ed., pp. 97-106). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Gurin, M.G. (1987). Is marketing dangerous for fund raising?Fund Raising Management, 17, 72-75.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Handy, F. (2000). How we beg: The analysis of direct mail appeals. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(3), 439-454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lohmann, R.A. (1992). The commons: New perspectives on nonprofit organizations and voluntary action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Mansbridge, J. (1998). On the contested nature of the public good. In W.W. Powell & E.S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 3-19). New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
- Nisbet, R.A. (1971). The quest for community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: A Plume Book.
- Ostrander, S.A., & Schervish, P.G. (1990). Giving and getting: Philanthropy as a social relation. In J. Van Til and Associates, Critical issues in American philanthropy: Strengthening theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Pratt, J. (1997). Fund raising practices and civic engagement. In D.F. Burlingame (Ed.)., Critical issues in fund raising (pp. 247-255). New York: John Wiley.
- Pribbenow, P. (1997). Professional formation and public accountability. In D.F. Burlingame (Ed.), Critical issues in fund raising (pp. 3-17). New York: John Wiley.
- Ryan, W.P. (1999). The new landscape for nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 77, 127-136.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.
- Steinberger, P.J. (1999). Public and private. Political Studies, 47, 292-313.[CrossRef]
- Wood, J.R., & Hougland, J.G., Jr. (1990). The role of religion in philanthropy. In J. Van Til and Associates, Critical issues in American philanthropy: Strengthening theory and practice (pp. 99-132). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 1,
128-140 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764002250010
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
A. Shoham, A. Ruvio, E. Vigoda-Gadot, and N. Schwabsky
Market Orientations in the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector: A Meta-Analysis of Their Relationships With Organizational Performance
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
September 1, 2006;
35(3):
453 - 476.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
