This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Plowden, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Compact

Attempts to Regulate Relationships between Government and the Voluntary Sector in England

In 1996, an independent inquiry into the voluntary sector in England recommended that there should be a `concordat' or `compact' embodying agreed guidelines for relationships between government and the voluntary sector. Since then, work has been continuous on drafting both a basic Compact and more detailed codes to regulate the behavior of both parties in areas such as funding, consultation, the use of volunteers, contacts with Black and ethnic minority organizations, etc. The Compact and several codes are now in force. Current questions include whether their existence can be made known to the thousands of individuals and organizations involved and whether, having no legal force, they can become effective constraints on inappropriate actions.

Key Words: voluntary sector • England • government • local government • Compact

References

• Carrington, D. (2002). The compact—The challenge of implementation. London: The Active Community Unit, Home Office.
• Compact Working Group Secretariat (CWG). (2000). Annual meeting to review the compact on relations between government and the voluntary and community sector in England Tuesday 9 May: Progress report on the development of the compact and codes of practice [and other related documents].
• Compact Working Group Secretariat (CWG). (2001). Guidance for public/voluntary sect or partnerships: A proposed supplement to the funding code. London: CWG.
• Craig, G., Taylor, M., Wilkinson, M., & Bloor, K. (2002). Contract or trust: The role of compact in local governance. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
• Department of National Heritage (DNH). (1996). Raising the voltage: The government's response to the Deakin commission report. London: DNH.
• HM Prison Service. (2001). Working with the voluntary and community sector. London: HM Prison Service.
• Home Office. (1998). Compact on relations between government and voluntary and community sector in England. London: Home Office.
• Home Office. (2001). Central government funding of voluntary and community organisations, 1982/83 to 1999/2000. London: Home Office.
• Home Office and Compact Working Group Secretariat (CWG). (2000a). Consultation and policy appraisal: A code of good practice. London: Home Office.
• Home Office and Compact Working Group Secretariat (CWG). (2000b). Funding: A code of good practice. London: Home Office.
• Home Office and Compact Working Group Secretariat (CWG). (2001a). Black and minority ethnic voluntary and community organisations: A code of good practice. London: Home Office.
• Home Office and Compact Working Group Secretariat (CWG). (2002). Report of the second annual meeting to review the compact between ministers and representatives from the voluntary and community sector. London: Home Office.
• House of Commons. (1996, July 23). Debates, cols. 206 et seq.
• Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF). (2002). Black and minority ethnic organisations' experience of local compacts. England: Joseph Roundtree.
• Kendall, J. (2000). The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: Whys and wherefores. Policy and Politics, 28(4), 541-562.[CrossRef]
• Labour Party. (1997). Building the future together: Labour's policies for partnership between government and the voluntary sector. London: The Labour Party.
• Local Government Association and Working Group on Government Relations Secretariat (LGA and WGGRS). (2000). Local compact guidelines: Getting local relationships right together. London: NCVD.
• National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO). (1996). Meeting the challenge of change: Voluntary action into the 21st century. London: NCVD.
• Osborne, S. P., & McLaughlin, K. (2002). Trends and issues in the implementation of local `voluntary sector compacts.' Public Money and Management, 22(1), 55-63.
• Refugee Council. (2001). Note of meeting of 8/9 November 2001.
• Stowe, K., & Etherington, S. (1996, October 10). Letter to Howard Webber, Home Office.
• Treasury. (2002). The role of the voluntary and community sector in service delivery. A cross cutting review. London: HM Stationery Office.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 3, 415-432 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764003254909


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Osborne, G. Jenei, and G. Fabian `Whispering at the Back Door'?: Local Government -- Voluntary and Community Sector Relationships in Post-accession Hungary Public Policy and Administration, October 1, 2008; 23(4): 331 - 350. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Plowden, W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?