|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Methodology Is Destiny: The Effect of Survey Prompts on Reported Levels of Giving and Volunteering
Patrick Rooney
Indiana University and Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, rooney{at}iupui.edu
Kathryn Steinberg
Indiana University and Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis, ksteinbe{at}iupui.edu
Paul G. Schervish
Boston College and Indiana University
This article extends earlier methodological tests of giving and volunteering in Indiana to a large (N = 4,200) cross-sectional sample collected in the United States in the fall of 2001. The authors find that the results are consistent with those found in the earlier analyses, namely, that longer, more detailed prompts led respondents to recall giving and volunteering at higher incidence rates (proportion donating at all or volunteering at all) and at higher levels (dollars given or hours volunteered) than when compared to survey methodologies with fewer prompts.
Key Words: giving • volunteering • measurement • methodology
References
- Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory, 6, 383-406.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Belli, R. F., Shay, W. L., & Stafford, F. P. (2001). Event history calendars and question list surveys: A direct comparison of interviewing methods. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(1), 45-74.[Abstract]
- Bradburn, N. M., & Sudman, S. (1988). Polls and surveys: Understanding what they tell us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Bradley, R., Holden, S., & McClelland, R. (1999). Arobust estimation of the effects of taxation on charitable contributions (Working paper). Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- DeMaio, T. J. (1984). Social desirability and survey measurement: A review. In C. F. Turner & E. Martin (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (Vol. 2, pp. 257-282). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- DeMaio, T. J., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1996). Cognitive interviewing techniques: In the lab and in the field. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 177-195). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Hall, M. (2001). Measurement issues in surveys of giving and volunteering and strategies applied in the design of Canada’s National Survey Of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 515-526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hall, M., McKeown, L., & Roberts, K. (2001). Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2000 National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy and Statistics Canada.
- Havens, J. J., & Schervish, P. G. (2001) The methods and metrics of the Boston Area Diary Study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 527-550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Independent Sector. (1999). Giving and volunteering in the United States, 1999 edition. Washington, DC: Author.
- Independent Sector. (2001). Giving and volunteering in the United States, 2001 edition. Washington, DC: Author.
- Jalandoni, N., & Hume, K. (2001). America’s family volunteers. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
- Moore, J. C., Stinson, L. L., & Welniak, E. J., Jr. (1999). Income reporting in surveys: Cognitive issues and measurement error. In M. G. Sirkiin, D. J. Herrmann, S. Schecter, N. Schwarz, J. M. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition and survey research (pp. 155-174). New York: John Wiley.
- O’Neill, M. (2001). Research on giving and volunteering: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 505-514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- O’Neill, M., & Roberts, W. L. (2000). Giving and volunteering in California. San Francisco: University of San Francisco, Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management.
- Rooney, P., Mesch, D., Chin, W., & Steinberg, K. (2003, November). The effects of race, gender, and survey methodologies on giving in the U.S. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Montreal, Canada.
- Rooney, P. M., Steinberg, K. S., & Schervish, P .G. (2001). A methodological comparison of giving surveys: Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 551-568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schervish, P., & Havens, J. (1998). Embarking on a republic of benevolence? New survey findings on charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 237-242.[Abstract]
- Shum, M. S., & Rips, L. J. (1999). The respondent’s confession: Autobiographical memory in the context of surveys. In M. G. Sirkiin, D. J. Herrman, S. Schecter, N. Schwarz, J. M. Tanur, & R. Tourangean (Eds.), Cognition and survey research (pp. 95-109). New York: John Wiley.
- Steinberg, K. S., & Rooney, P. M. (2002, November). America gives: A survey of Americans’ generosity after September 11. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Montreal, Canada.
- Steinberg, K. S., Rooney, P. M., & Chin, W. (2002). Measurement of volunteering: A methodological study using Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 484-501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wentland, E. J., & Smith, K. W. (1993). Survey responses: An evaluation of their validity. New York: Academic Press.
- Wilhelm, M. (2002, November). The distribution of giving in six surveys. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Montreal, Canada.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4,
628-654 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764004269312
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
C. Guo and L. R. Peck
Giving and Getting: Charitable Activity and Public Assistance
Administration Society,
September 1, 2009;
41(5):
600 - 627.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. J. Webb and R. Abzug
Do Occupational Group Members Vary in Volunteering Activity?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
December 1, 2008;
37(4):
689 - 708.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Meslin, P. M. Rooney, and J. G. Wolf
Health-Related Philanthropy: Toward Understanding the Relationship Between the Donation of the Body (and Its Parts) and Traditional Forms of Philanthropic Giving
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
March 1, 2008;
37(1_suppl):
44S - 62S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Brown and J. M. Ferris
Social Capital and Philanthropy: An Analysis of the Impact of Social Capital on Individual Giving and Volunteering
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
March 1, 2007;
36(1):
85 - 99.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Mesch, P. M. Rooney, K. S. Steinberg, and B. Denton
The Effects of Race, Gender, and Marital Status on Giving and Volunteering in Indiana
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
December 1, 2006;
35(4):
565 - 587.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Bekkers and P. Wiepking
To Give or Not to Give, That Is the Question: How Methodology Is Destiny in Dutch Giving Data
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,
September 1, 2006;
35(3):
533 - 540.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
