This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Archibald, M. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

An Organizational Ecology of National Self-Help/Mutual-Aid Organizations

Emory University

Although a considerable amount of research on modern self-help/mutual aid has been undertaken during the past several decades, studies have yet to address the question What are the organizational dynamics underlying the institutionalization of self-help/mutual aid? As a partial answer to this question, the author describes the central patterns of growth, decline, and persistence of national self-help/mutual-aid organizations, their formal diversification, and the extent to which subpopulations gain market share. In addition to using an organizational—ecological focus to map the trajectory of voluntary organizations, this article builds on resource partitioning theory by applying its central insights to subtypes of organizations. Expansion of self-help/mutual aid is remarkably similar to the trajectories of commercial and bureaucratic populations, but expectations that generalist concentration fosters growth of specialist organizations are not supported. Specialists dominate generalists except among medical self-help/ mutual aid. Implications for future research are discussed.

Key Words: organizational ecology • self-help/mutual aid • resource partitioning

References

• Archibald, M.E. (2002). The population dynamics of modern self-help/mutual-aid: Institutional and organizational change in the civil sector, 1955-2000. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle.
• Archibald, M.E. (2004). Between isomorphism and market partitioning: How organizational competencies and resources foster cultural and sociopolitical legitimacy, and promote organizational survival. In C. Johnson (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 22, pp. 171-211). Oxford, UK: JAI.
• Barron, D.N. (1999). The structuring of organizational populations. American Sociological Review, 64, 421-446.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Baum, J.A.C. (1996). Organizational ecology. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizations studies (pp. 77-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Boone, C., Carroll, G.R., & Witteloostuijn, A. (2002). Resource distributions and market partitioning: Dutch daily newspapers, 1968 to 1994. American Sociological Review, 67, 408-431.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Borkman, T.J. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual-aid: Experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.
• Carroll, G., & Swaminathan, A. (2000). Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the American brewing industry after probation. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 715-762.[CrossRef]
• Carroll, G.R. (1985). Concentration and specialization: Dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations. American Sociological Review, 100, 720-749.
• Carroll, G.R., Dobrev, S.D., & Swaminathan, A. (2003). Organizational processes of resource partitioning. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 381-413). New York: JAI/Elsevier.
• Carroll, G.R., & Hannan, M.T. (2000). The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 209-232.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Davison, K.P., Pennebaker, J.W., & Dickerson, S.S. (2000). Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. American Psychologist, 55, 205-217.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Dowd, T.J. (2004). Concentration and diversity revisited: Production logics and the U.S. mainstream recording market, 1940 to 1990. Social Forces, 82, 1411-1455.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Gale Research Company. (1955- 2000). Encyclopedia of associations, national organizations (Vols. 1-36). Detroit, MI: Author.
• Goldstein, M.S. (1992). The health movement: Promoting fitness in America. New York: Twayne.
• Haider-Markel, D.P. (1997). Interest group survival: shared interests versus competition for resources. The Journal of Politics, 59, 903-912.[CrossRef]
• Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J.H. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Humphreys, K., & Rappaport, J. (1993). Researching self-help/mutual-aid groups and organizations: Many roads, one journey. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3, 217-231.
• Kaminer, W. (1992). I'm dysfunctional, you're dysfunctional: The recovery movement and other self-help fashions. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Katz, A.H. (1993). Self-help in America: A social movement perspective. New York: Twayne.
• Katz, A.H., & Bender, E.I. (1976). Self-help groups in Western society: History and prospects. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 265-282.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Kurtz, L.F. (1997). Self-help and support groups: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Lieberman, M.A., & Snowden, L.R. (1994). Problems in assessing prevalence and membership characteristics of self-help group participants. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the self-help organization: Frameworks and findings (pp. 32-49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Leventhal, G.S., Maton, K.I., & Madara, E.J. (1988). Systematic organizational support for self-help groups. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 592-603.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Luke, D., Roberts, A.L., & Rappaport, J. (1994). Individual, group context and individual-group fit predictors of self-help group attendance. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the self-help organization: Frameworks and findings (pp. 88-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Martin, A.W., Baumgartner, F., & McCarthy, J.D. (2006). Measuring association populations using the encyclopedia of associations: Evidence from the field of labor unions. Social Science Research, 35(3), 771-778.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Maton, K.I. (1989). Towards and ecological understanding of mutual-help groups: The social ecology of "fit." American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 729-753.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Maton, K.I. (1993). Moving beyond the individual level of analysis in mutual help group research: An ecological paradigm. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 272-286.[Abstract]
• Mezias, J., & Mezias, S.J. (2000). Resource partitioning, the founding of specialist firms, and innovation: The American feature film industry, 1912-1929. Organization Science, 11, 306-322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Minkoff, D.C. (1994). From service provision to institutional advocacy: The shifting legitimacy of organizational forms. Social Forces, 72, 943-969.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Minkoff, D.C. (1995). Organizing for equality: The evolution of women's and racial-ethnic organizations in America, 1955-1985. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Pfeffer, J. (1997). New directions for organization theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Powell, T.J. (1987). Self-help organizations and professional practice. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
• Powell, T.J. (1990). Working with self-help. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
• Powell, T.J. (1994). Introduction. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the self-help organization: Frameworks and findings (pp. 1-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Riessman, F. (1985). New dimensions in self-help. Social Policy, 15, 2-4.
• Ruef, M., Mendel, P., & Scott, W.R. (1998). An organizational field approach to resource environments in healthcare: Comparing hospitals and home health agencies in the San Francisco Bay region. Health Services Research, 32, 775-803.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Ruggie, M. (2004). Marginal to mainstream: Alternative medicine in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Scheidlinger, S. (2000). The group psychotherapy movement at the millennium: Some historical perspectives. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 50, 315-339.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Schubert, M.A., & Borkman, T.J. (1991). An organizational typology for self-help. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 769-787.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Scott, W.R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Scott, W.R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P.J., & Caronna, C.A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Shepherd, M.D., Schoenberg, M., Slavich, S., Wituk, S., Warren, M., & Meissen, M. (1999). Continuum of professional involvement in self-help groups. Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 39-53.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Smith, D.H. (2000). Grassroots associations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Tucker, D., Singh, J., Meinhard, A., & House, R. (1988). Ecological and institutional sources of change in organizational populations. In G. Carroll (Ed.), Ecological models of organizations (pp. 127-152). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
• Twombly, E.C. (2003). What factors affect the entry and exit of nonprofit human service organizations in metropolitan areas? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(2), 211-235.[Abstract]
• White, B. J., & Madara, E. (Eds.). (2002). The self-help sourcebook: Finding and forming mutual aid self-help groups (7th ed.). Denville: New Jersey Self-Help Clearinghouse.
• Wolch, J.R. (1996). Community-based human service delivery. Housing Policy Debate, 7, 649-671.[Web of Science]

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 4, 598-621 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764006297666


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Archibald, M. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?