Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hager, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 2, 252-267 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0899764003032002005

Notes

Response Rates for Mail Surveys of Nonprofit Organizations: A Review and Empirical Test

Mark A. Hager

The Urban Institute

Sarah Wilson

United Way of America

Thomas H. Pollak

The Urban Institute

Patrick Michael Rooney

Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis

The failure of a substantial portion of mail survey recipients to respond to invitations to participate in research projects raises issues of nonresponse error. Because this error is difficult to quantify, survey researchers seek high rates of return to signal legitimacy and reduce questions regarding nonresponse bias. Research on survey method indicates that the design of the survey research process has a measurable influence on the rate of survey returns. This article focuses on three aspects of research design that are expected to influence mail survey returns in surveys of nonprofit organizations: questionnaire complexity, use of Federal Express versus standard mail, and the use of monetary incentives. Using an experimental design, the research concludes that questionnaire complexity and the use of monetary incentives generate no difference in returns, whereas the use of Federal Express to deliver the survey to nonprofit executives has a measurable positive effect.

Key Words: survey research • response rates • nonprofit organizations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Human ResourcesHome page
S. E. Carrell, F. V. Malmstrom, and J. E. West
Peer Effects in Academic Cheating
J. Human Resources, January 1, 2008; 43(1): 173 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 NASSP BulletinHome page
M. Kano and L. B. Bourque
Experiences With and Preparedness for Emergencies and Disasters Among Public Schools in California
NASSP Bulletin, September 1, 2007; 91(3): 201 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
B. Gazley and J. L. Brudney
The Purpose (and Perils) of Government-Nonprofit Partnership
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, September 1, 2007; 36(3): 389 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S S Hawkins and C Law
Patterns of research activity related to government policy: a UK web based survey
Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 1107 - 1111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
K. Kearns, C. Park, and L. Yankoski
Comparing Faith-Based and Secular Community Service Corporations in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, June 1, 2005; 34(2): 206 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]